{"_buckets": {"deposit": "77b58d44-d700-411f-8f99-00a66f432253"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "310", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "310"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000310", "sets": ["56"]}, "author_link": ["558"], "control_number": "310", "item_3_biblio_info_12": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2008-06-20", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "47", "bibliographicPageStart": "27", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "8", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "尚美学園大学総合政策論集", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Shobi journal of policy studies, Shobi University", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_3_description_10": {"attribute_name": "抄録(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "安楽死の適法化に関しては、学説などに於いて今なお様々な議論がある。また、安楽死の違法性を阻却する事により適法であるとする学説と責任を阻却するとする学説には刑法体系上実質的な対立がある。名古屋高裁は判決文の中で、違法性阻却事由としての安楽死の要件を提示し、侵害行為がこれらの要件に合致する場合には安楽死は適法となると判示した。しかし、本判決文中では6 要件を導いた法理が明確に提示されておらず、又、6 要件の内容に対しても種々の見解が出されている。筆者は、本論文に於いて6要件の法的な根拠を明らかにするとともに、その要件の妥当性を検討した。又、本論文では、刑法の形式的な側面と実質的な側面とを考慮し、犯罪認定の思考プロセスにも踏み込んだ。しかし、犯罪認定の思考方法を身につける為に本論文を記したのではない。6要件の法理を明確にする上で犯罪認定の思考方法を必要としたのである。", "subitem_description_language": "ja", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_11": {"attribute_name": "抄録(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Various theories exist as to the basis on which euthanasia should be made legal in Japan.A substantial opposition exists between rejecting the illegality of euthanasia on the basis of extenuating circumstances and rejecting responsibility for an illegal action.In a 1962 decision, the Nagoya High Court presented six extenuating circumustances,for the justification of euthanasia, and showed that, since these conditions were satisfaied,the act of infringement was lawful.However, the Nagoya High Court judges did not clearly show the principle of law bywhich they arrived at the conditions ,and various theoretical objections were raised.This paper examines the validity of the justifiable conditions cited in the Nagoya HighCourt judgement and clarifies the legal principle underlying them.In order to consider both what is contained in the penal code and what happened insubstance,the decision process of judging the case was examined in detail.Althought this was not the main intention of the paper,the process was necessary in orderto clarify the principle of law which led to the extenuating circumstances.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_15": {"attribute_name": "表示順", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "2", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_16": {"attribute_name": "アクセション番号", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "KJ00005075938", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_8": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "論文", "subitem_description_language": "ja", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_9": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Article", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_publisher_22": {"attribute_name": "出版社", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "尚美学園大学総合政策学部総合政策学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_3_source_id_1": {"attribute_name": "雑誌書誌ID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA12006349", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_3_source_id_19": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13497049", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_3_text_6": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "ja", "subitem_text_value": "尚美学園大学大学院総合政策研究科研究生"}]}, "item_3_text_7": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "en", "subitem_text_value": "Shobi University"}]}, "item_3_title_3": {"attribute_name": "論文名よみ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "アンラクシ ノ イホウセイ ソキャク ニ カンスル ホウリ", "subitem_title_language": "ja-Kana"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "metadata only access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "江尻, 尚崇", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "エジリ, ナオタカ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}, {"creatorName": "EJIRI, Naotaka", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "558", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "安楽死", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "違法性阻却", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "違法性阻却事由", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "利益衡量", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "明示な意思", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "euthanasia", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "justification", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "justifiable cause", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "balancing of interests", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "express will", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "安楽死の違法性阻却に関する法理", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "安楽死の違法性阻却に関する法理", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "The legal basis for euthanasia: concerning a legal principle for the justification of euthanasia in Japan", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "3", "owner": "3", "path": ["56"], "permalink_uri": "https://shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/310", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2017-04-21"}, "publish_date": "2017-04-21", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "310", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["安楽死の違法性阻却に関する法理"], "weko_shared_id": -1}