@article{oai:shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000334,
 author = {大木, 啓介 and OOKI, Keisuke},
 journal = {尚美学園大学総合政策論集, Shobi journal of policy studies, Shobi University},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {The plea to mix quantitative and qualitative methods is increasingly popular in comparative political science. Because both quantitative and qualitative analyses suffer from certain specific shortcomings but mixing methods is supposed to lead to combining the advantages of both methods and correcting their respective weaknesses.Yet the methodological problems linked with this research strategy have not yet received much attention. Therefore this paper considers the pitfalls of mixed methods research with particular reference to the conceptualization problem, drawing upon comparison of quantitative and qualitative conceptualizations and the enevitable stretching of concepts as they are translated between quantitative and qualitative usages., 2, KJ00008203359, 論文, Article},
 pages = {29--41},
 title = {比較政治分析における混合研究法の陥穽 : 特に概念化問題に焦点を据えて},
 volume = {14},
 year = {2012},
 yomi = {オオキ, ケイスケ}
}