{"created":"2023-05-15T08:20:21.737559+00:00","id":321,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"af65f7b3-5018-4cd6-91f2-d538c4ccf503"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"321","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"321"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000321","sets":["10:8:59"]},"author_link":["580"],"control_number":"321","item_3_biblio_info_12":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2010-12-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"107","bibliographicPageStart":"87","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"11","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"尚美学園大学総合政策論集","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"Shobi journal of policy studies, Shobi University","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_3_description_10":{"attribute_name":"抄録(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"前篇に引き続き、極東委員会の訪日調査団と総司令部民政局(GS)との会合に関する2通りの記録を読み比べることにより、1946 年1 月17 日の訪日調査団とGSとの会合で、憲法改正問題について実際にはどのような議論がなされたのかという点を検討した。その結果、「憲法改革」に関するGS報告書に記された回答は、この報告書の公表時点でのGSの公式見解であり、ホイットニー局長の採用した見解に他ならないことが明らかになった。そのホイットニーがそれから幾日もたたぬうちにそのGS報告書で示した見解の見直しに着手したのは、昭和天皇の留位を望んだマッカーサーが、その留位があっても米国政府等がそれを容認し得るような抜本的な憲法改正を受け入れるように日本政府に秘密裏に働きかけるという方針を打ち出したからだというのが本稿の提示する仮説である。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_11":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Continued from Part I, this paper compares 2 different records of the conference held onJanuary 17, 1946, between the Far Eastern Advisary Commission then on a visit to Japanand the Government Section [GS] staffs of GHQ/SCAP, and tries to discern what was actually discussed in this conference about questions concerning constitutional reform of Japan. The findings is that the discussions on constitutional reform described in the GS report should be regarded as the official opinion of GS approved by Courtney Whitney, chief of GS, at the moment of completing the report. But within several days Whitney started to review the conclusion of this report. Why did he so? This paper suggests that with a strong desire to let Emperor Hirohito retain the throne, General MacArthur made up his mind to lead the Japanese government in secrecy to accept such a radical revision of the Constitution as the U.S. government and others might permit the Emperor to keep his position, and ordered Whitney to work out a successful plan of operation.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_15":{"attribute_name":"表示順","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"5","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_16":{"attribute_name":"アクセション番号","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"KJ00007085819","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_8":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"論文","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_9":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Article","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_publisher_22":{"attribute_name":"出版社","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"尚美学園大学総合政策学部総合政策学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_3_source_id_1":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12006349","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_3_source_id_19":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"13497049","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_3_text_6":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"ja","subitem_text_value":"尚美学園大学総合政策学部"}]},"item_3_text_7":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Shobi University"}]},"item_3_title_3":{"attribute_name":"論文名よみ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"コンフェソール シツモン ト ミンセイキョク ホウコクショ ノ サイケントウ コウヘン","subitem_title_language":"ja-Kana"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"metadata only access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"笹川, 隆太郎","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"ササガワ, リュウタロウ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"},{"creatorName":"SASAGAWA, Ryutaro","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"日本国憲法","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"極東委員会","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"マッカーサー","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ホイットニー","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Constitution of Japan","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Far Eastern Commission","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"MacArthur, Douglas","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Whitney, Courtney","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"「コンフェソール質問」と民政局報告書の再検討(後篇)","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"「コンフェソール質問」と民政局報告書の再検討(後篇)","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Queries by Tomas Confesor & the Government Section Report dated 17 Jan 1946 Reconsidered (Part II fin.)","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"3","owner":"3","path":["59"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2017-04-21"},"publish_date":"2017-04-21","publish_status":"0","recid":"321","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["「コンフェソール質問」と民政局報告書の再検討(後篇)"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-09-21T02:56:11.723086+00:00"}