@article{oai:shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000053,
 author = {御手洗,大輔 and MITARAI,Daisuke},
 journal = {尚美学園大学総合政策論集, Shobi journal of policy studies, Shobi University},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {論文, Articles, 日本では三審制が通用するが、中国では通用しない。日本を含む西欧法では事件の処理および法適用の統一性の確保という2 つの要請に応えるために、その審級制度として三審制を採用するが、同じ要請の下であっても現代中国法では四級二審制を採用する。比較法研究を通すと、この相違がそれぞれの社会を支える権利に対する考え方の相違と関連することが明らかになる。, The three-trial system works in Japan, but not in China. Western law and Japanese law adopts the　three-trial system as its trial-level system in order to meet the dual demands of handling cases and ensuring uniformity in the application of law. Even under the same demands, PRC law adopts the four-level, two-trial system. Through Comparative law research, it becomes clear that this difference is related to the differences in each view of rights ( in the respective societies' conceptions of the rights that underpin them).},
 pages = {31--46},
 title = {三審制は普遍の原理か : 比較法研究の学問的意義の再確認を含めて},
 volume = {37},
 year = {2023},
 yomi = {ミタライ,ダイスケ}
}