WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "1c468e4d-e7ef-4819-adcb-33db9175b960"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "334", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "334"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000334", "sets": ["62"]}, "author_link": ["614"], "control_number": "334", "item_3_biblio_info_12": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2012-06-30", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "41", "bibliographicPageStart": "29", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "14", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "尚美学園大学総合政策論集", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Shobi journal of policy studies, Shobi University", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_3_description_11": {"attribute_name": "抄録(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The plea to mix quantitative and qualitative methods is increasingly popular in comparative political science. Because both quantitative and qualitative analyses suffer from certain specific shortcomings but mixing methods is supposed to lead to combining the advantages of both methods and correcting their respective weaknesses.Yet the methodological problems linked with this research strategy have not yet received much attention. Therefore this paper considers the pitfalls of mixed methods research with particular reference to the conceptualization problem, drawing upon comparison of quantitative and qualitative conceptualizations and the enevitable stretching of concepts as they are translated between quantitative and qualitative usages.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_15": {"attribute_name": "表示順", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "2", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_16": {"attribute_name": "アクセション番号", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "KJ00008203359", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_8": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "論文", "subitem_description_language": "ja", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_9": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Article", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_publisher_22": {"attribute_name": "出版社", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "尚美学園大学総合政策学部総合政策学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_3_source_id_1": {"attribute_name": "雑誌書誌ID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA12006349", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_3_source_id_19": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13497049", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_3_text_6": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "ja", "subitem_text_value": "尚美学園大学総合政策学部"}]}, "item_3_text_7": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "en", "subitem_text_value": "Shobi University"}]}, "item_3_title_3": {"attribute_name": "論文名よみ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "ヒカク セイジ ブンセキ ニ オケル コンゴウ ケンキュウホウ ノ カンセイ : トクニ ガイネンカ モンダイ ニ スエテ", "subitem_title_language": "ja-Kana"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "大木, 啓介", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "オオキ, ケイスケ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}, {"creatorName": "OOKI, Keisuke", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "614", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-04-21"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "KJ00008203359.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "755.6 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_11", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 755600.0, "url": {"label": "KJ00008203359.pdf", "url": "https://shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/334/files/KJ00008203359.pdf"}, "version_id": "8a42ef17-74a3-4174-a84a-114913548464"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "概念拡大適用", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "質的方法", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "量的方法", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "内的妥当性", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "外的妥当性", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "conceptual stretching", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "qualitative method", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "quantitative method", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "internal validity", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "external validity", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "比較政治分析における混合研究法の陥穽 : 特に概念化問題に焦点を据えて", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "比較政治分析における混合研究法の陥穽 : 特に概念化問題に焦点を据えて", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "The Pitfalls of Mixed Methods Research in Comparative Political Analysis :With particular reference to the Conceptualization Problem", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "3", "owner": "3", "path": ["62"], "permalink_uri": "https://shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/334", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2017-04-21"}, "publish_date": "2017-04-21", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "334", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["比較政治分析における混合研究法の陥穽 : 特に概念化問題に焦点を据えて"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
比較政治分析における混合研究法の陥穽 : 特に概念化問題に焦点を据えて
https://shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/334
https://shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/334c7a6f4e6-5c25-49f9-932c-da44933889b0
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
KJ00008203359.pdf (755.6 kB)
|
Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-04-21 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | 比較政治分析における混合研究法の陥穽 : 特に概念化問題に焦点を据えて | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | The Pitfalls of Mixed Methods Research in Comparative Political Analysis :With particular reference to the Conceptualization Problem | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 概念拡大適用 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 質的方法 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 量的方法 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 内的妥当性 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 外的妥当性 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | conceptual stretching | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | qualitative method | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | quantitative method | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | internal validity | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | external validity | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA12006349 | |||||
論文名よみ | ||||||
言語 | ja-Kana | |||||
タイトル | ヒカク セイジ ブンセキ ニ オケル コンゴウ ケンキュウホウ ノ カンセイ : トクニ ガイネンカ モンダイ ニ スエテ | |||||
著者 |
大木, 啓介
× 大木, 啓介 |
|||||
著者所属(日) | ||||||
ja | ||||||
尚美学園大学総合政策学部 | ||||||
著者所属(英) | ||||||
en | ||||||
Shobi University | ||||||
記事種別(日) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
記事種別(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Article | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
抄録(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | The plea to mix quantitative and qualitative methods is increasingly popular in comparative political science. Because both quantitative and qualitative analyses suffer from certain specific shortcomings but mixing methods is supposed to lead to combining the advantages of both methods and correcting their respective weaknesses.Yet the methodological problems linked with this research strategy have not yet received much attention. Therefore this paper considers the pitfalls of mixed methods research with particular reference to the conceptualization problem, drawing upon comparison of quantitative and qualitative conceptualizations and the enevitable stretching of concepts as they are translated between quantitative and qualitative usages. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 尚美学園大学総合政策論集 en : Shobi journal of policy studies, Shobi University 巻 14, p. 29-41, 発行日 2012-06-30 |
|||||
表示順 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 2 | |||||
アクセション番号 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | KJ00008203359 | |||||
出版社 | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
出版者 | 尚美学園大学総合政策学部総合政策学会 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 13497049 |