WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "270e8531-b578-49bc-bed0-9d8f99aa21e0"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "26", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "26"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000026", "sets": ["13"]}, "author_link": ["23"], "control_number": "26", "item_3_biblio_info_12": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2001-10-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "69", "bibliographicPageStart": "49", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "2", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "尚美学園大学総合政策研究紀要", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}, {"bibliographic_title": "Bulletin of policy and management, Shobi University", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_3_description_11": {"attribute_name": "抄録(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The main topic of this paper is a much-debated problem in comparative research methodology, namely, is it possible to draw longitudinal inferences from cross-sectional comparisons? The author attempts to answer this question with particular reference to S.M.Lipset\u0027s economic development hypothesis on democratization. The hypothesis that \"wealth fosters democracy\", which was put forth in the late 1950s, has survived increasingly statistical tests drawing mainly on cross-sectional data. After reviewing the outlines of this hypothesis, the author explains how it is characterized by a tendency to infer longitudinal diachronic generalizations from cross-sectional, synchronic ones. It is then considered whether the \"developmental equivalence\" assumption underlying this inference is legitimate or not. The answer is in negative. In short, synchronic comparisons cannot substitute for diachronic ones. But even if historical informations and diachronic propositions are needed for avoiding falling into the \"cross-sectional fallacy\", can we assert the epistemological superiority of diachronic comparisons over synchronic ones? Considering the problem of multi-collinearity in temporal series of information, we cannot assert so. In general, for the causal interpretation of longitudinal change of a phenomenon, synchronic comparisons are as essential as diachronic ones to the process of verifying hypotheses and generalizations.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_15": {"attribute_name": "表示順", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "5", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_16": {"attribute_name": "アクセション番号", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "KJ00002411862", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_8": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "論文", "subitem_description_language": "ja", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_9": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Article", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_publisher_22": {"attribute_name": "出版社", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "尚美学園大学総合政策学部", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_3_source_id_1": {"attribute_name": "雑誌書誌ID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11546318", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_3_source_id_19": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "13463802", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_3_text_6": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "ja", "subitem_text_value": "尚美学園大学総合政策学部"}]}, "item_3_text_7": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "en", "subitem_text_value": "Shobi University"}]}, "item_3_title_3": {"attribute_name": "論文名よみ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "キョウジ ヒカク ツウジ ヒカク インガ スイロン I"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "大木, 啓介", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "オオキ, ケイスケ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}, {"creatorName": "OOKI, Keisuke", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "23", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-04-21"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "KJ00002411862.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.5 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_11", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1500000.0, "url": {"label": "KJ00002411862.pdf", "url": "https://shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/26/files/KJ00002411862.pdf"}, "version_id": "71721dd0-29cc-40df-9d3b-d46cb9410fd9"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "共時比較、通時比較、因果推論(I)", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "共時比較、通時比較、因果推論(I)", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "Synchronic Comparison, Diachronic Comparison and Causal Inference (I)", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "3", "owner": "3", "path": ["13"], "permalink_uri": "https://shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/26", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2017-04-21"}, "publish_date": "2017-04-21", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "26", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["共時比較、通時比較、因果推論(I)"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
共時比較、通時比較、因果推論(I)
https://shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/26
https://shobi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/26e18f04ea-752e-460f-811d-ac85d446f56a
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
KJ00002411862.pdf (1.5 MB)
|
Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-04-21 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | 共時比較、通時比較、因果推論(I) | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | Synchronic Comparison, Diachronic Comparison and Causal Inference (I) | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA11546318 | |||||
論文名よみ | ||||||
タイトル | キョウジ ヒカク ツウジ ヒカク インガ スイロン I | |||||
著者 |
大木, 啓介
× 大木, 啓介 |
|||||
著者所属(日) | ||||||
ja | ||||||
尚美学園大学総合政策学部 | ||||||
著者所属(英) | ||||||
en | ||||||
Shobi University | ||||||
記事種別(日) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
記事種別(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Article | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
抄録(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | The main topic of this paper is a much-debated problem in comparative research methodology, namely, is it possible to draw longitudinal inferences from cross-sectional comparisons? The author attempts to answer this question with particular reference to S.M.Lipset's economic development hypothesis on democratization. The hypothesis that "wealth fosters democracy", which was put forth in the late 1950s, has survived increasingly statistical tests drawing mainly on cross-sectional data. After reviewing the outlines of this hypothesis, the author explains how it is characterized by a tendency to infer longitudinal diachronic generalizations from cross-sectional, synchronic ones. It is then considered whether the "developmental equivalence" assumption underlying this inference is legitimate or not. The answer is in negative. In short, synchronic comparisons cannot substitute for diachronic ones. But even if historical informations and diachronic propositions are needed for avoiding falling into the "cross-sectional fallacy", can we assert the epistemological superiority of diachronic comparisons over synchronic ones? Considering the problem of multi-collinearity in temporal series of information, we cannot assert so. In general, for the causal interpretation of longitudinal change of a phenomenon, synchronic comparisons are as essential as diachronic ones to the process of verifying hypotheses and generalizations. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 尚美学園大学総合政策研究紀要 en : Bulletin of policy and management, Shobi University 巻 2, p. 49-69, 発行日 2001-10-31 |
|||||
表示順 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 5 | |||||
アクセション番号 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | KJ00002411862 | |||||
出版社 | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
出版者 | 尚美学園大学総合政策学部 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 13463802 |